CUP Web site

RSS Feed

New Books

Author Interviews

Author Events

Keep track of new CUP book releases:

For media inquiries, please contact our
publicity department

CUP Authors Blogs and Sites

American Society of Magazine Editors

Roy Harris / Pulitzer's Gold

Natalie Berkowitz / Winealicious

Leonard Cassuto

Mike Chasar / Poetry and Popular Culture

Erica Chenoweth / "Rational Insurgent"

Juan Cole

Jenny Davidson / "Light Reading"

Faisal Devji

William Duggan

James Fleming / Atmosphere: Air, Weather, and Climate History Blog

David Harvey

Paul Harvey / "Religion in American History"

Bruce Hoffman

Alexander Huang

David K. Hurst / The New Ecology of Leadership

Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh

Geoffrey Kabat / "Hyping Health Risks"

Grzegorz W. Kolodko / "Truth, Errors, and Lies"

Jerelle Kraus

Julia Kristeva

Michael LaSala / Gay and Lesbian Well-Being (Psychology Today)

David Leibow / The College Shrink

Marc Lynch / "Abu Aardvark"

S. J. Marshall

Michael Mauboussin

Noelle McAfee

The Measure of America

Philip Napoli / Audience Evolution

Paul Offit

Frederick Douglass Opie / Food as a Lens

Jeffrey Perry

Mari Ruti / The Juicy Bits

Marian Ronan

Michael Sledge

Jacqueline Stevens / States without Nations

Ted Striphas / The Late Age of Print

Charles Strozier / 9/11 after Ten Years

Hervé This

Alan Wallace

James Igoe Walsh / Back Channels

Xiaoming Wang

Santiago Zabala

Press Blogs


University of Akron

University of Alberta

American Management Association

Baylor University

Beacon Broadside

University of California

Cambridge University Press

University of Chicago

Cork University

Duke University

University of Florida

Fordham University Press

Georgetown University

University of Georgia

Harvard University

Harvard Educational Publishing Group

University of Hawaii

Hyperbole Books

University of Illinois

Island Press

Indiana University

Johns Hopkins University

University of Kentucky

Louisiana State University

McGill-Queens University Press

Mercer University

University of Michigan

University of Minnesota

Minnesota Historical Society

University of Mississippi

University of Missouri


University of Nebraska

University Press of New England

University of North Carolina

University Press of North Georgia

NYU / From the Square

University of Oklahoma

Oregon State University

University of Ottawa

Oxford University

Penn State University

University of Pennsylvania

Princeton University

Stanford University

University of Sydney

University of Syracuse

Temple University

University of Texas

Texas A&M University

University of Toronto

University of Virginia

Wilfrid Laurier University

Yale University

July 19th, 2013 at 8:43 am

Further reading on the problem with God from Peter J. Steinberger

The Problem with God

This week our featured book is The Problem with God: Why Atheists, True Believers, and Even Agnostics Must All Be Wrong, by Peter J. Steinberger. In the Afterword of his book, Professor Steinberger provides a list of further reading for those who want to know more about the problem with God. Today, we have a selection of this list, with excerpts from Steinberger’s commentary.

Be sure to enter our book giveaway for a chance to win a FREE copy of The Problem with God!

Reading List

Aristotle: Metaphysics, Book Lambda (L)
“Where we encounter, I believe for the very first time, the notion of an Unmoved Mover ….”

Lucretius: On the Nature of Things
“He—Lucretius—was a kind of ‘atomist.’ Like us, he believed that the world is basically composed of atoms. He also believed that the world was originally created not by the gods but by the mixing up and combination of atoms, perhaps a kind of proto—Big Bang.”

Thomas Aquinas: Summa Theologica, First Part, Question 2, Article 3
“It’s [here] that we actually find Thomas’s famous five arguments for—or ‘five ways’ to prove—the existence of God. The five ways include the ontological argument and the so-called argument from design as well as the cosmological argument.”

Anthony Kenney: The Five Ways
“For an extremely important and deeply intelligent criticism of St. Thomas, you should look at Anthony Kenney’s The Five Ways ….”

John Locke: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book IV, Chapter 10, Sections 1-3
“Like Thomas …, his argument for the existence of God isn’t limited to the cosmological argument. Both of them adopt a full-court-press—or kitchen sink—strategy.”

David Hume: Dialogues on Natural Religion, Part IX
“David Hume … denies that there’s anything contradictory in believing that some of the things that exist were not caused to exist. He seems to reject, in other words, the necessity of the logic of cause and effect.”

J. L. Mackie: The Miracle of Belief
“Mackie was an atheist—not so much because he thought he had proven that God doesn’t exist but because he believed, all in all, that God’s non-existence is more likely to be true.”

Alvin Plantinga: The Analytic Theist, “Reason and Belief in God”
“In this essay, Plantinga acknowledges that some versions of the kind of argument I’ve been trying to make here might actually be ‘of great interest.’ He nonetheless insists, like Mackie, that the concept of God is perfectly coherent. Also like Mackie, he frustratingly fails to say why ….”

Bede Rundle: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing
“The idea of a First Cause makes as little sense to Rundle as it does to me. And when he says that scientists—like Big Bang theorists or Higgs particle theorists—‘have something to say only once their subject matter, the physical universe, is supposed in being,’ this seems to me exactly right.”

William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith: Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology
“Craig defends theism and Smith atheism—both in the context of (what I take to be) a serious understanding of the physics and mathematics of Big Bang Theory.”

“Last, but very far from least”:
Immanuel Kant: Critique of Pure Reason, Book II, Chapter III; Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics; Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals
“I might suggest, without too much exaggeration, that pretty much all of Western philosophy after Kant is largely an attempt to come to grips with—to refute or refine or reanimate—Kant’s system of thought. And this is probably true not only of his thought in general but of his thought about God.”

Post a comment