About

Columbia University Press Pinterest

Twitter

Facebook

CUP Web site

RSS Feed

New Books

Author Interviews

Author Events

Keep track of new CUP book releases:
e-newsletters

For media inquiries, please contact our
publicity department

CUP Authors Blogs and Sites

American Society of Magazine Editors

Leonard Cassuto

Mike Chasar / Poetry and Popular Culture

Erica Chenoweth / "Rational Insurgent"

Juan Cole

Jenny Davidson / "Light Reading"

Faisal Devji

William Duggan

James Fleming / Atmosphere: Air, Weather, and Climate History Blog

David Harvey

Paul Harvey / "Religion in American History"

Bruce Hoffman

Alexander Huang

David K. Hurst / The New Ecology of Leadership

Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh

Geoffrey Kabat / "Hyping Health Risks"

Grzegorz W. Kolodko / "Truth, Errors, and Lies"

Jerelle Kraus

Julia Kristeva

Michael LaSala / Gay and Lesbian Well-Being (Psychology Today)

David Leibow / The College Shrink

Marc Lynch / "Abu Aardvark"

S. J. Marshall

Michael Mauboussin

Noelle McAfee

The Measure of America

Philip Napoli / Audience Evolution

Paul Offit

Frederick Douglass Opie / Food as a Lens

Jeffrey Perry

Mari Ruti / The Juicy Bits

Marian Ronan

Michael Sledge

Jacqueline Stevens / States without Nations

Ted Striphas / The Late Age of Print

Charles Strozier / 9/11 after Ten Years

Hervé This

Alan Wallace

James Igoe Walsh / Back Channels

Xiaoming Wang

Santiago Zabala

Press Blogs

AAUP

University of Akron

University of Alberta

American Management Association

Baylor University

Beacon Broadside

University of California

Cambridge University Press

University of Chicago

Cork University

Duke University

University of Florida

Fordham University Press

Georgetown University

University of Georgia

Harvard University

Harvard Educational Publishing Group

University of Hawaii

Hyperbole Books

University of Illinois

Island Press

Indiana University

Johns Hopkins University

University of Kentucky

Louisiana State University

McGill-Queens University Press

Mercer University

University of Michigan

University of Minnesota

Minnesota Historical Society

University of Mississippi

University of Missouri

MIT

University of Nebraska

University Press of New England

University of North Carolina

University Press of North Georgia

NYU / From the Square

University of Oklahoma

Oregon State University

University of Ottawa

Oxford University

Penn State University

University of Pennsylvania

Princeton University

Stanford University

University of Sydney

University of Syracuse

Temple University

University of Texas

Texas A&M University

University of Toronto

University of Virginia

Wilfrid Laurier University

Yale University

December 1st, 2010 at 8:22 am

Daniel Rigney: The Matthew Effect as Social Spiral

Daniel Rigney, The Matthew EffectThe following is a post by Daniel Rigney, author of The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage.

The “Matthew effect” is a term coined by the Columbia University sociologist Robert Merton in 1968 to describe a common pattern in social systems: advantage tends to beget further advantage. The phrase derives from a scripture in the biblical book of Matthew (with corresponding passages in Mark and Luke) proclaiming that to those who have, more will be given, while for those who have not, even that will be taken away.

In its context, the passage refers to the growth of spiritual understanding and the development of talents, but in our own more materialist context it is often loosely paraphrased to mean “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.” As Merton uses the term, however, the “riches” in question may be either material or nonmaterial, denoting the growth of inequalities not just in economic wealth but also in political power, prestige, knowledge, or any other scarce and valued resource.

Merton’s own research in this instance pertains to the distribution of prestige in scientific communities. He found that scientists who studied in more prestigious graduate programs tended to accumulate more advantages—prestigious appointments, research grants, awards, and the like—than did equally productive scientists from less prestigious programs. Their initial advantages in turn attracted still further advantages. This self-perpetuating accumulation of advantage serves as an example of what I shall call a social spiral. Matthew effects thus tend to create upward spirals of cumulative advantage as success breeds further success.

The corollary, however, is that initial disadvantage in turn often leads to further disadvantage. Being born into poverty, for example, greatly increases the probability of remaining poor, and each further disadvantage makes it increasingly difficult to escape the economic undertow. Those who are economically vulnerable, such as middle- or working-class people who suddenly become unemployed in a recession or lose a source of income through death or illness, may find themselves trapped in a downward spiral of disadvantage.

We are speaking here of probabilities and not absolutes. No one denies that there are “rags to riches” stories, but these are less typical than “rags to rags” or “riches to riches” stories. Yet rags-to-riches stories, however atypical, are often trotted out to promote the ideology that ours is indeed a land of equal opportunity. Neither Merton nor any other reasonable person would argue that Matthew effects are universal or inevitable, and in my book I consider several conditions that limit their scope. But the general pattern of self-reinforcing inequality should be familiar to anyone who pays attention to the realities of social life. As energy billionaire T. Boone Pickens writes in his autobiography, “the first billion is the hardest.”

The Matthew effect joins a number of other concepts in the social sciences that may be characterized as social spirals. Economists speak of inflationary spirals, spiraling unemployment, and spiraling debt. Demographers speak of population explosions in which birth rates so exceed death rates that (excluding migration) the total size of a population spirals out of control. These spirals resemble or exemplify what systems theorists call positive feedback loops, in which processes feed upon themselves in such a way as to cause nonlinear patterns of growth. (By contrast, negative feedback loops, exemplified by thermostats, tend to have stabilizing effects, returning a system to a state of equilibrium.) The Matthew effect is an instance of a positive feedback loop in the distribution of resources of all kinds in social systems.

I argue in my book The Matthew Effect that this concept is among the most important—and yet least known—in the social sciences. I wrote the book to bring it to wider public attention. This idea deserves not just to be understood but also to inform public policy decisions that have an impact on inequality, in such areas as taxation and civil rights. Current proposed changes in public policy threaten to drive us ever further into what economist Paul Krugman and many others have called a new Gilded Age. These are times that call for a deeper awareness of social spirals in general and Matthew effects in particular.

1 Comment

  1. Jenny Lantz says:

    [...] ett par år sedan kom Columbiaprofessorn Daniel Rigney ut med boken The Matthew effect, där han beskriver fenomenet i en uppsjö olika sammanhang. Han [...]

Post a comment