About

Columbia University Press Pinterest

Twitter

Facebook

CUP Web site

RSS Feed

New Books

Author Interviews

Author Events

Keep track of new CUP book releases:
e-newsletters

For media inquiries, please contact our
publicity department

CUP Authors Blogs and Sites

American Society of Magazine Editors

Leonard Cassuto

Mike Chasar / Poetry and Popular Culture

Erica Chenoweth / "Rational Insurgent"

Juan Cole

Jenny Davidson / "Light Reading"

Faisal Devji

William Duggan

James Fleming / Atmosphere: Air, Weather, and Climate History Blog

David Harvey

Paul Harvey / "Religion in American History"

Bruce Hoffman

Alexander Huang

David K. Hurst / The New Ecology of Leadership

Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh

Geoffrey Kabat / "Hyping Health Risks"

Grzegorz W. Kolodko / "Truth, Errors, and Lies"

Jerelle Kraus

Julia Kristeva

Michael LaSala / Gay and Lesbian Well-Being (Psychology Today)

David Leibow / The College Shrink

Marc Lynch / "Abu Aardvark"

S. J. Marshall

Michael Mauboussin

Noelle McAfee

The Measure of America

Philip Napoli / Audience Evolution

Paul Offit

Frederick Douglass Opie / Food as a Lens

Jeffrey Perry

Mari Ruti / The Juicy Bits

Marian Ronan

Michael Sledge

Jacqueline Stevens / States without Nations

Ted Striphas / The Late Age of Print

Charles Strozier / 9/11 after Ten Years

Hervé This

Alan Wallace

James Igoe Walsh / Back Channels

Xiaoming Wang

Santiago Zabala

Press Blogs

AAUP

University of Akron

University of Alberta

American Management Association

Baylor University

Beacon Broadside

University of California

Cambridge University Press

University of Chicago

Cork University

Duke University

University of Florida

Fordham University Press

Georgetown University

University of Georgia

Harvard University

Harvard Educational Publishing Group

University of Hawaii

Hyperbole Books

University of Illinois

Island Press

Indiana University

Johns Hopkins University

University of Kentucky

Louisiana State University

McGill-Queens University Press

Mercer University

University of Michigan

University of Minnesota

Minnesota Historical Society

University of Mississippi

University of Missouri

MIT

University of Nebraska

University Press of New England

University of North Carolina

University Press of North Georgia

NYU / From the Square

University of Oklahoma

Oregon State University

University of Ottawa

Oxford University

Penn State University

University of Pennsylvania

Princeton University

Stanford University

University of Sydney

University of Syracuse

Temple University

University of Texas

Texas A&M University

University of Toronto

University of Virginia

Wilfrid Laurier University

Yale University

March 21st, 2012 at 6:43 am

Interview with Nicoli Nattrass, author of “The AIDS Conspiracy: Science Fights Back”

Nicoli Nattrass, The AIDS Conspiracy: Science Fights BackThe following is an interview with Nicoli Nattrass, author of The AIDS Conspiracy: Science Fights Back

Question: What is AIDS conspiracy theory?

Nicoli Nattrass: The central AIDS conspiracy theory is that HIV was created in a laboratory (perhaps with the help of the CIA) to inflict harm. Ironically, the idea that U.S. scientists invented HIV was initially promoted by the Russian KGB and the East German Stasi in a genuine conspiracy to spread misinformation. There are now many local variants of AIDS conspiracy beliefs–for example, in South Africa a common story is that HIV was created by the apartheid government’s chemical warfare program, with assistance from the United States.

Q: Why does AIDS conspiracy theory matter?

NN: AIDS conspiracy beliefs matter because they reflect and reinforce broader suspicions toward medical science. AIDS conspiracy believers in the United States and South Africa are less likely to use condoms, less likely to test for HIV, and less likely to take antiretroviral treatment. Why did you write the book? I was concerned about the way that AIDS conspiracy theories had been promoted at the highest levels in South Africa, and continue to resonate today. The book is the product of my exploration of how these ideas travel and take root, why they resonate socially, and what can be done to fight them.


Q: Is it possible to fight AIDS conspiracy beliefs?

NN: It is frustratingly difficult combating AIDS conspiracy beliefs because evidence to the contrary is all too easily dismissed as “part of the conspiracy.” In such an atmosphere of mistrust, the credibility of the person countering the AIDS conspiracy theory is really important. This is why I write about (and dedicate my book to) David Gilbert, a U.S. prisoner who produced the first critique of AIDS conspiracy theories. Gilbert had some success because he acknowledged the reasons why AIDS conspiracy theories resonated for many black prisoners and was a credible voice because he had been jailed for revolutionary activities linked to the Black Panthers.

Q: You write about AIDS conspiracy beliefs and AIDS denialism–what is the link?

NN: AIDS denialists believe that HIV is harmless, if it exists at all, and that antiretroviral treatment is poison, even a cause of AIDS. It is a conspiracy theory because it implies HIV science has been irredeemably corrupted by the pharmaceutical companies. Like the HIV-as-bioweapon myth, AIDS denialism undermines public trust in HIV prevention and treatment messages.

Q: You talk about “cultropreneurs” in your book. What are they?

NN: Cultropreneurs are entrepreneurs who use conspiracy theories about scientific medicine as part of a marketing strategy to promote their own “alternative” healing products. In my book I show how cultropreneurs are important to AIDS denialists because they offer healing services and products in the place of antiretrovirals. The tragedy is that none of these alternative therapies has been proved to work. Thus, the “living icons” of AIDS denialism–those HIV-positive people who supposedly offer “proof of concept” by appearing to live healthily without antiretroviral drugs–eventually die of AIDS.

Q: Your subtitle is “Science Fights Back.” Why?

NN: I was heartened by the many different ways in which scientists, clinicians, and pro-science activists have fought against AIDS denialism in support of evidence-based approaches to healing. These range from conventional scientific papers’ debunking of false beliefs, to protest action against publishers for providing outlets for discredited AIDS denialist claims, to comment strings and blogs on the Internet. Pro-science activists have been particularly successful at exposing the false claims of the cultropreneurs and documenting the deaths of the living icons. I write about some of these actions in my book, concluding that the fight for science and reason is alive and well.

Post a comment