About

Twitter

Facebook

CUP Web site

RSS Feed

New Books

Author Interviews

Author Events

Keep track of new CUP book releases:
e-newsletters

For media inquiries, please contact our
publicity department

CUP Authors Blogs and Sites

American Society of Magazine Editors

Leonard Cassuto

Mike Chasar / Poetry and Popular Culture

Erica Chenoweth / "Rational Insurgent"

Juan Cole

Jenny Davidson / "Light Reading"

Faisal Devji

William Duggan

James Fleming / Atmosphere: Air, Weather, and Climate History Blog

David Harvey

Paul Harvey / "Religion in American History"

Bruce Hoffman

Alexander Huang

David K. Hurst / The New Ecology of Leadership

Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh

Geoffrey Kabat / "Hyping Health Risks"

Grzegorz W. Kolodko / "Truth, Errors, and Lies"

Jerelle Kraus

Julia Kristeva

Michael LaSala / Gay and Lesbian Well-Being (Psychology Today)

David Leibow / The College Shrink

Marc Lynch / "Abu Aardvark"

S. J. Marshall

Michael Mauboussin

Noelle McAfee

The Measure of America

Philip Napoli / Audience Evolution

Paul Offit

Frederick Douglass Opie / Food as a Lens

Jeffrey Perry

Mari Ruti / The Juicy Bits

Marian Ronan

Michael Sledge

Jacqueline Stevens / States without Nations

Ted Striphas / The Late Age of Print

Charles Strozier / 9/11 after Ten Years

Hervé This

Alan Wallace

James Igoe Walsh / Back Channels

Xiaoming Wang

Santiago Zabala

Press Blogs

AAUP

University of Akron

University of Alberta

American Management Association

Baylor University

Beacon Broadside

University of California

Cambridge University Press

University of Chicago

Cork University

Duke University

University of Florida

Fordham University Press

Georgetown University

University of Georgia

Harvard University

Harvard Educational Publishing Group

University of Hawaii

Hyperbole Books

University of Illinois

Island Press

Indiana University

Johns Hopkins University

University of Kentucky

Louisiana State University

McGill-Queens University Press

Mercer University

University of Michigan

University of Minnesota

Minnesota Historical Society

University of Mississippi

University of Missouri

MIT

University of Nebraska

University Press of New England

University of North Carolina

University Press of North Georgia

NYU / From the Square

University of Oklahoma

Oregon State University

University of Ottawa

Oxford University

Penn State University

University of Pennsylvania

Princeton University

Stanford University

University of Sydney

University of Syracuse

Temple University

University of Texas

Texas A&M University

University of Toronto

University of Virginia

Wilfrid Laurier University

Yale University

May 7th, 2009 at 11:01 am

Interview with Mitchell Orenstein, editor of Pensions, Social Security, and the Privatization of Risk

Mitchell OrensteinThe following is an interview with Mitchell A. Orenstein, editor of Pensions, Social Security, and the Privatization of Risk.

Q: Is Social Security going to be there when I retire?

Mitchell Orenstein: Surprisingly, the answer is yes. After years of Republicans like Ralph Reed telling us that Social Security won’t be there when Americans retire, that the system is in deep crisis, etc., it turns out that they were entirely wrong. The 2008 financial crisis revealed that Social Security benefits are relatively stable and reliable. It’s your 401(k) that may not be there for you when you retire. The problems of Social Security are relatively small and fixable compared to the massive problems affecting the individual retirement accounts system. And yet, with the decline of company pension plans, more and more Americans will be forced to rely on their savings in these 401(k)-type accounts.

Q: Your book presents several options for pension reform in the United States; which do you think is the best one?

MO: As editor of a book presenting multiple options for reform, I have tried not to pick and choose among the reform ideas offered by the various chapter authors, all of whom are major experts in the field. Gary Burtless’s idea of expanding enrollment in better-regulated 401(k) type accounts, Alicia Munnell’s idea of a new tier of retirement security, and Teresa Ghilarducci’s proposal for guaranteed retirement accounts are all worth considering. My hope is that policymakers and the general public will think for themselves about the reform options on the table and that they will take international examples into account as well. In my own chapter, I argue for looking more closely at reforms in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK, all of which have pension systems similar to our own and have adopted or proposed some form of quasi-mandatory or mandatory workplace pension coverage.

Q: Given the recent stock market performance, why would anybody invest their pension money in 401(k) accounts?

MO: Good question. A lot of us are wondering why we thought stocks were such a great investment. The irony is that this is probably a great time to invest in stocks, at least compared to a few years ago. The best time to contribute to a funded pension is probably when the market is down, even though for understandable political economy reasons people are less likely to believe that investing in the stock market is a good idea at such times.

Q: The Obama administration has a lot on its plate. Is it going to consider pension reform as well?

MO: I believe so. We have seen in recent weeks and months that this administration has an ambitious reform agenda. The Democrats have a large majority in Congress that may not last. Also, Lawrence Summers and Peter Orszag are well-known pension reform advocates. I would be very surprised if they do not put forward a substantial reform to rebalance Social Security and possibly introduce a quasi-mandatory employee pension savings system on top of that. The White House chief of public administration is an author of Nudge, a book that among other things advocated quasi-mandatory pension savings, meaning automatic enrollment in a 401(k)-type account with an opportunity for individuals to opt out if they have other priorities. We know that people are much more likely to save under such circumstances.

Q: Is this a book for the general reader? What audience are you addressing in this book?

MO: We want this book to appeal to policymakers in Washington, D.C., and experts on pension reform but also to the average educated reader. As experts we have a lot of experience writing for other experts. It is sometimes harder for us to write for a general audience. We have taken care to avoid jargon, write in plain English, and make the ideas and numbers accessible to a wide audience. The editing is fantastic, and the chapters relatively short. We hope that students will read this book in class and that policymakers who want a quick introduction to the best reform ideas for the future will read it as well. A lot of people—regular citizens—in the United States are very concerned about their pensions. That’s why Congress has held so many hearings about pension reform recently, inviting several of our authors into the discussion. As we saw in the Social Security debate in 2005, the general public is a major component in these debates. People seek out expertise and formulate their own ideas about reform rather than following what politicians tell them to do. They are interested in and mobilized around this issue. Their future is at stake, after all.

1 Comment

  1. Ewa says:

    Ja bardzo przepraszam za moje naiwne pytanie – czy tak mądrzy ludzie jak Pan nie mogą wspólnie edukować społeczeństwa różnych państw świata.
    Mam nadzieje ze można stworzyć takie stowarzyszenie wtedy jest większa siła przekazu i mniejszy strach , że mogą uciszyć bo mówi się coś co pewnemu lobby nie odpowiada.
    Np. BŚ.
    Przypomnę wspólne działania obywateli Boliwii po prywatyzacji wodociągów.
    Należy zmobilizować ludzi a możliwości są duże w dobie internetu.
    Czytałam fragmenty Pana książki- rewelacja- Prywatyzacja emerytur. Niestety nie mogę jej dostać w j. polskim
    przykro mi ale niestety nie umie j. angielskiego.
    Pozdrawia Ewa Machowska.

Post a comment