About

Twitter

Facebook

CUP Web site

RSS Feed

New Books

Author Interviews

Author Events

Keep track of new CUP book releases:
e-newsletters

For media inquiries, please contact our
publicity department

CUP Authors Blogs and Sites

American Society of Magazine Editors

Leonard Cassuto

Mike Chasar / Poetry and Popular Culture

Erica Chenoweth / "Rational Insurgent"

Juan Cole

Jenny Davidson / "Light Reading"

Faisal Devji

William Duggan

James Fleming / Atmosphere: Air, Weather, and Climate History Blog

David Harvey

Paul Harvey / "Religion in American History"

Bruce Hoffman

Alexander Huang

David K. Hurst / The New Ecology of Leadership

Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh

Geoffrey Kabat / "Hyping Health Risks"

Grzegorz W. Kolodko / "Truth, Errors, and Lies"

Jerelle Kraus

Julia Kristeva

Michael LaSala / Gay and Lesbian Well-Being (Psychology Today)

David Leibow / The College Shrink

Marc Lynch / "Abu Aardvark"

S. J. Marshall

Michael Mauboussin

Noelle McAfee

The Measure of America

Philip Napoli / Audience Evolution

Paul Offit

Frederick Douglass Opie / Food as a Lens

Jeffrey Perry

Mari Ruti / The Juicy Bits

Marian Ronan

Michael Sledge

Jacqueline Stevens / States without Nations

Ted Striphas / The Late Age of Print

Charles Strozier / 9/11 after Ten Years

Hervé This

Alan Wallace

James Igoe Walsh / Back Channels

Xiaoming Wang

Santiago Zabala

Press Blogs

AAUP

University of Akron

University of Alberta

American Management Association

Baylor University

Beacon Broadside

University of California

Cambridge University Press

University of Chicago

Cork University

Duke University

University of Florida

Fordham University Press

Georgetown University

University of Georgia

Harvard University

Harvard Educational Publishing Group

University of Hawaii

Hyperbole Books

University of Illinois

Island Press

Indiana University

Johns Hopkins University

University of Kentucky

Louisiana State University

McGill-Queens University Press

Mercer University

University of Michigan

University of Minnesota

Minnesota Historical Society

University of Mississippi

University of Missouri

MIT

University of Nebraska

University Press of New England

University of North Carolina

University Press of North Georgia

NYU / From the Square

University of Oklahoma

Oregon State University

University of Ottawa

Oxford University

Penn State University

University of Pennsylvania

Princeton University

Stanford University

University of Sydney

University of Syracuse

Temple University

University of Texas

Texas A&M University

University of Toronto

University of Virginia

Wilfrid Laurier University

Yale University

October 18th, 2012 at 6:00 am

From Shameful to Sexy — Kelly Oliver on Changing Representations of Pregnancy

Kelly Oliver, Knock Me Up, Knock Me Down

“Pregnancy and pregnant bodies have gone from shameful and hidden to sexy and spectacular”—Kelly Oliver

In From Shameful to Sexy, the introduction to Knock Me Up, Knock Me Down: Images of Pregnancy in Hollywood Films , Kelly Oliver examines the shifting image of the pregnant woman in popular culture and Hollywood films.

She argues that this phenomenon has taken pregnancy out of the closet, it also creates unrealistic expectations for women to have it all. It also reflects ambivalent attitudes toward women’s roles and traditional family values, and new technologies of reproduction.

Here is an excerpt from the introduction:

Pregnancy has become an obsession in popular culture where paparazzi are constantly on the lookout for celebrities’ telltale “baby bumps” and heavily pregnant bellies, and reality television shows and tabloid magazines parade teen pregnancies, sexy “momshells,” and celebrity baby woes and triumphs. Pregnancy and pregnant bodies have gone from shameful and hidden to sexy and spectacular….

Certainly, positive and desirable images of pregnant women are a step forward. But if we look closer, we can see how these seemingly new stories repeat traditional ideas about abject maternal bodies, conventional notions of family values, familiar anxieties over women’s role in reproduction, and fears of miscegenation. In addition, current ideals that promote pregnancy and maternity as desirable, especially for career women, bring new expectations that often require heroic efforts and large doses of caffeine, antidepressants, and sleeping pills—not to mention Mama Spanx maternity wear, “mommy-tucks,” diet fads, and taxing workouts at the gym. Today, women are not only responsible for the health and welfare of their babies but also expected to stay beautiful and fit while pregnant and to lose their “baby fat” as soon as possible in order to “get their bodies back” (as one tabloid put it, suggesting that their pregnant bodies are not their real bodies). Pregnancy has become like an accessory worn by the rich and famous, an adornment that can be removed. Pregnant celebrities go from lack to excess and back again, from anorexic to sporting the telltale “baby bump,” so popular in the media. Now, rather than laying in or staying at home, pregnant women are expected to exercise, continue working, and still be beautiful and sexy for their male partners. In the words of Wenda Wardell Morrone, “We can all recognize the successful pregnant working woman: she is the one in the maternity jogging suit running a marathon on her way to chairing a business meeting; she’ll give birth in her lunch hour without even smudging her eye shadow. She is also a fantasy”.

If Hollywood did not create this fantasy, it continues to feed it. Indeed, in recent years Hollywood has helped revive the fantasy of women “having it all”—babies, careers, sexy bodies, and the freedom to enjoy them. Pregnancy has become as desirable as ever, now fueled by images of “knocked-up knockouts,” “momshells,” and pregnant celebrities. Hollywood is giving birth to new images of sexy, cute, and attractive pregnancies offscreen and on….

Even though the myth of “having it all” is still alive and well, as evidenced by these Hollywood films in which career women get babies, find “the one,” remain sexy, and apparently live happily ever after, real women continue to grapple with how to juggle career and family in the face of ever-shrinking social services and support. Hollywood attempts to quell these anxieties with reassuring tales of white career women getting babies before it’s too late and of girls and women turning unwanted pregnancies into wanted babies. Or it terrorizes us with horror and sci-fi fantasies in which abject monstrous hybrid offspring—usually the result of technological mediation and human hubris—threaten the end of the human race as we know it. In either case, Hollywood’s recent fascination with pregnancy displays continued anxieties about women’s role in reproduction and continued ambivalence about pregnant embodiment. Even as Hollywood films present pregnant bodies in ways unimaginable only a couple of decades ago, they continue to picture conventional attitudes toward women, pregnancy, and childbirth. Even while they attempt to grapple with new reproductive technologies and women’s expanding choices regarding reproduction, they manifest fears and anxieties that surround them.

Although recent Hollywood films show us some of the difficulties of reproductive choice, they usually end with resolutions that cover over, if not openly disavow, the ambiguities of women’s desires and freedoms. For the most part, they do not engage the complexities of reproductive freedom in a culture where women’s value is still seen, at least in part, in terms of having and raising babies. Although the debates over motherhood and feminism have changed—with Sarah Palin we supposedly have a new brand of “rogue feminism”—the culture that inspires them has not changed as dramatically as we might think. If pregnant Hollywood films are any indication, above all, women are still expected to reproduce, only now they are also expected to freely choose to do so and to do it the old-fashioned way lest they risk giving birth to monsters. If they do give birth to monsters, they are expected to love them anyway with the ferocity of the mother-love that any female should feel, whether human or animal. Like most women expecting babies, however, Hollywood prefers that their offspring have ten (human) fingers and ten (human) toes. But even if they don’t, the little monsters provide good entertainment by giving life to latent desires and fears, both old and new. In spite of their tendency to simplify and resolve the ambiguities and ambivalences of women’s choices about issues of motherhood, sexuality, and pregnancy, recent Hollywood films also show us characters struggling with them. Pregnancy films show us women refusing the either/or of traditions that make them choose career over family and relationships. Today, questions of family and career are no longer necessarily simple either/or choices. Beyond the myth of “having it all,” (middle-class) women are trying to figure out how to have both/and. Even as they create new myths of “having it all,” recent Hollywood pregnancy films also display deep-seated anxieties about women’s reproductive choices and the “accident” that is pregnancy in an age of changing technologies.

1 Comment

  1. What SUP from Your Favorite University Presses, October 19, 2012 | Yale Press Log says:

    [...] From shameful to sexy? Columbia University Press discusses the changing representations of pregnancy in popular culture and Hollywood [...]

Post a comment